Categories
- Constitution (7)
- Economics (35)
- general (56)
- Liberty (4)
- Nullification (23)
- Podcast (34)
- SC (134)
- Secession (105)
- Statism (3)
- US Empire (65)
Sunday night we are hosting the seventh podcast / live internet radio show on TalkShoe!
Here are all of the details:
The topic for this week is the state of the economy in South Carolina and how it is affected by the federal government.
Please call in or log on and ask us your questions, see you then!
One of the rallying cries of the American Revolution was “No Taxation without Representation!” as they were protesting a series of taxes imposed by a far away imperial government on the free people of the various colonies, without any consultation of their legislatures. Personally I would prefer the rallying cry of: “No Taxation!” but even if you accept the idea that some taxation is justified so long as there is fair representation then clearly the colonists were justified in their revolution and secession and clearly South Carolina would be justified in a modern secession.
The reason for this has two parts: First, it is a simple mathematical fact that South Carolina has zero influence on the federal government, which I will illustrate. Second, the US federal government imposes laws and taxes on individuals without any sort of check or balance from the state legislatures, as we have seen with current events such as the Bush-backed TARP bailout and the Obama-backed Healthcare takeover. If the federal government stuck to its original role under the Articles of Confederation, we may be in a different situation today. However the US Constitution (intentionally or not) gave the federal government supremacy over the state governments and therefore took away the rights of individuals to govern themselves. No matter how careful or inspired the construction of the Constitution and its series of checks and balances, mathematically it works out so that the most populous states run the show, and the rest of us are stuck with their decisions. This is especially true in our current situation since the Supreme Court has decided to re-write the constitution and since the President has the power to write laws from his desk. In effect, the home team is making up the rules as they go along, and they have the officials on their payroll.
For the purpose of this post, I will focus on the mathematics. As you are well aware of, the US Government consists of three branches, the executive, judicial, and legislative. I will show you how your vote as a South Carolinian has absolutely no effect on any of those branches. Lets start with the executive:
When electing a president, the United States government uses the Electoral College, wherein each state is assigned a certain number of votes based on population. Once a candidate has earned 270 electoral votes, they have won the election. South Carolina has 8 electoral votes out of a total of 538.
This pales in comparison to the larger states: California has 55, almost 7 times as many. New York has 31, nearly 4 times as many as South Carolina. To put that in perspective, in order for the smallest states to cancel out the vote of just the one state of California: South Carolina, West Virginia, Hawaii, Idaho, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming would all have to vote for the same person (the opposite of California’s vote.) How likely does that sound? Not very.
Clearly you can see that your vote for president (as a South Carolinian) simply has no effect on the outcome. In fact, all that’s needed to win the presidency are the electoral college votes from the following states:
The next branch of government is the Judicial, and as we have illustrated before, the members of the Supreme Court simply do not represent the people of South Carolina. Also, the judicial branch is appointed by the executive branch, and as we have no impact on the executive, we also have no impact on the judicial.
Finally there is the legislative branch. This branch is broken into two parts: the House of Representatives, with representation apportioned to the states by population, and the Senate, where each state gets two representatives without regard for population. In the House there are 435 seats (as opposed to the constitutionally guaranteed 1 seat per 30,000 people), of which only 6 are from South Carolina.
Again we can compare this to California, who has 53 seats, or nearly 9 times as many:
In fact, in order for a bill to pass the house, in only needs to meet the approval of the members from the top 9 states:
So here again we see that your vote in South Carolina just doesn’t matter. You could take your favorite politician ever, clone them 6 times and put them in all of our seats in the House, and they wouldn’t make a bit of difference whatsoever. Their votes are simply drowned out by those of the larger states.
Moving on to the Senate, we finally see a group where South Carolina has equal representation with the other states. However, this legislative body is far removed from its intended purpose and has become a cesspool of lobbyists, pork barrel spending, partisan politics, etc. The reason for this is the 17th Amendment to the constitution, which changed the Senate from a body of representatives of each state into a body of popularly elected legislators, just like the House of Representatives. The reason this is so damaging is that Senators have 6 year terms and have a great deal of power and authority, so once they are elected they quickly lose interest in representing their electors or their state, and instead serve special interests and lobbyists. If they do something against the wishes of their state, so what! Where the state once had the authority to remove them and appoint new Senators, now we have basically an oligarchy that can do whatever they want.
To sum it all up, the situation is thus: the federal government controls our lives, and we have no say in it. They make laws that we must live with, and their laws affect what we can and cannot do in a supposedly free country, and we are left begging at their feet. If we wanted to drill offshore for oil to lower the gas prices and bring in thousands of jobs, too bad. If we wanted to legalize marijuana so that we could stop arresting people for ridiculous reasons and wasting so much money that could be spent elsewhere, too bad. If we wanted to encourage new construction of nuclear power plants to become more energy independent, too bad. If we wanted to protect jobs by enforcing immigration law, too bad. If we wanted to allow competing currencies to protect the buying power of our poor and our seniors from constant inflation, too bad. South Carolina’s citizens do not own their own lives and do not control their own government, and that will be the case so long as we are a member of the United States. The mathematical case for secession is clear.
One of the best reasons for South Carolina to establish its independence from the U.S. Federal government is the unlimited potential for economic growth and prosperity that we enjoy.
You may be shaking your head in disbelief after reading that first sentence, but believe it or not, it is true. If you are plugged into national politics and news then you’ve probably heard all of the damning statistics about South Carolina’s economy: our unemployment rate is high, our education is abysmal, our average income is in the bottom 5 nationally, the list goes on. Well, one of my favorite quotes succinctly addresses this situation:
“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.”
- Mark Twain
These statistics that supposedly show South Carolina’s weaknesses are taken completely out of context of the reality which exists in our state. The truth of the matter is that our current condition is much better than you might expect, and the majority of the problems we do have are a direct result of the actions of the United States federal government.
For the purposes of this article we will focus on one area: jobs. Why is it that South Carolina has high unemployment and low wages? Let’s start with capital: in order for capitalism to “work” as an economic system, people must have capital. When people have capital, they make investments, they expand their business, they start new business, etc; in short: they create new jobs.
There are several ways for a person who isn’t already wealthy to get capital:
Taking a quick glance at that list you can see that they are ordered from easiest to hardest, depending on things like risk, probability, and return potential. Number 1 and 2 are the most easily attainable by the average person, even though they do take hard work and determination. If you were working for a software company and you wanted to go out on your own and start your own consulting firm, you have two options: you can risk everything and start your company with no capital (and God bless the people who have the intestinal fortitude to do so), or you can save up and get an amount of money set aside so that you don’t need a guaranteed income in the beginning months of your new company. Obviously the second option is the safest and the one most people would prefer.
So why don’t more people do just that? As we’ve illustrated before, the United States federal government is robbing us of the portion of our paychecks that could otherwise be used as capital:
In that example, a family is bringing home $70,000 per year, of which the U.S.A. steals $22,855 plus the $5,355 they extort from their employer. This leaves up to $28,210 that could have been used by that family as investment capital, which they may have placed into buying a new car, buying a house, or starting a business. Instead, we live in a world where people have to go into debt to buy that new car, and even more debt to put a roof over their heads, effectively putting chains around their ankles. Even if someone did want to risk everything and start a business without any capital, they effectively can’t because of the debts they have accumulated just trying to get by. South Carolinians who may have opened up their own auto shop or started their own Web 2.0 enterprise or invented a new power saving engine are instead “stuck” working for their current employer just so they don’t fall behind on their payments.
What then is the alternative?
Let’s imagine a free South Carolina, one that does not have the burden of the federal government oppressing our people. South Carolina has a major port in Charleston, and an excellent tourism industry along the entire coast. We have a ton of fertile farmland and a very diverse mix of people and cultures. We have several universities, with nationally ranked Clemson focusing on agriculture and engineering and the state university focusing on Business, earning honors as the best International Business program around (which could come in very handy.) Who knows how much oil exists off our coast: we haven’t been allowed to drill for it. Even if we didn’t have an abundant amount, we could still trade for it and we could make more use of nuclear power and hydroelectric.
South Carolina is home to several technology companies and is an attraction to investment from outside companies such as BMW, Boeing, and others. Most importantly, a free South Carolina would not have the burden of the federal tax system, which robs capital from individuals (as we’ve illustrated) and stifles business through endless regulations, fees, and special taxes. We could establish South Carolina as a tax haven, charging only one simple, universal, flat sales tax that would be forever banned from going over 10%. Imagine the boom as businesses relocated to escape the persecution they face everywhere else in the world. Imagine the jobs that would be created and the rising quality of life that would be enjoyed by South Carolinians. Imagine if South Carolina herself won “the lottery” and attracted the $13 trillion in offshore accounts that have fled the U.S. Empire’s punishing tax system.
Imagine a free South Carolina. What could be finer?
Three years ago when I began studying the gold market, the fair market value of gold was $680/oz and seemed to change dramatically each day. I watched gold jump up 20 points, then drop 10; jump 40, then drop 15. I picked up a book called Gold: The Once and Future Money and scanned the internet looking for ideas, trends, and insider information. (By the way, the best site I have ever found for daily market research is at usagold.com, and no I don’t get paid anything to say that.) I became fascinated in what drove the market and studied how news affected its value.
More than a year after I started I met with a private investor seeking a solid investment to park a few thousand dollars; she had heard about the prospect of gold over bonds, CDs, or other such paper assets, so I shared what I knew over lunch. At the time, something just wasn’t right. There was mass speculation all over the internet about the banking failures, international exchange rates, inflation, and the price of oil. Something big was about to happen in the gold market, and those of us who keep up with it every day knew it.
I shared this with her and she decided to go ahead and make the move. By now the clock read nearly 3 p.m. and it seemed too late in the day to go through the trouble of locking in on the day’s market price. “First thing tomorrow morning,” we decided; we would make it happen then. Well, the next morning some news had beat me to the punch: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were bankrupted! The market started the day at $780/oz and within an hour gold was pushing $800. I watched the price go out of control as the next bombshell hit the news: FDIC was almost out of money; they were nearly bankrupt also! It wasn’t until gold hit $840/oz that I locked her in at the day’s price, and it closed the day at $860/oz. Since then, of course, gold has continued to climb (it’s now at $1,230/oz not a bad gain since our buy-in), but missing the day’s 10% market gain would have been icing on the cake.
Nevertheless, the following quotes I found in a Business Week’s Website article, and I want you to notice any psychologically-driven propaganda here [brackets added for my comments]:
But even if gold keeps rising [it will]—a prospect very difficult to predict, given the metal’s volatile track record [like Wall Street's??]—there are several features of gold that make it treacherous for individual investors, financial advisers say [wow, treacherous huh?].
Gold might have a reputation as a “safe haven,” but nothing could be further from the truth [I beg to differ], says Susan C. Elser, of Elser Financial Planning in Indianapolis [oh wait...she gets paid on commissions of selling paper assets, not hard assets]. Unlike other commodities, gold has few industrial uses [exactly! That's why we use gold (as opposed to other medals) for money]. Unlike businesses owned through the stock market, gold earns no profits and doesn’t pay out dividends [it doesn't LOSE value either; fundamentally, gold ALWAYS holds its buying power value]. Unlike bonds, no one pays interest to holders of gold [this is NEVER a reason to buy gold anyway]. And, unlike insured bank deposits, there is no guarantee of your principal investment [umm...but there is security in Wall Street and the FDIC that almost went bankrupt a year and a half ago?].
“There is no downside protection on investing in gold,” Elser says. [THANK GOD!!! AT LEAST WE HAVE SOMETHING!!!!]
…
Gold used to be the backing for currencies, but no longer [don't worry, it will be again]. Now “it really is only a store of value because people say it’s a store of value, [...exactly, do go on.]” says Ken Eaton, principal at Stepp & Rothwell, a financial planning firm in Overland Park, Kan. [Oh wait, he gets paid from selling paper assets too...] That can lead to extreme volatility, which financial planners cite as one of gold’s biggest downsides. [*scratches head* Wait ... stocks, bonds, and mutual funds have not been EXTREMELY volatile???]
Gold is just one part of a diverse portfolio, she says, with a portfolio allocation often kept to 5 percent, though “you could argue for a higher percentage.” [STOP THE PRESSES! Portfolios should have minimum 10% and up to 30% diversification in precious metals depending upon how confident you feel in the dollar.] A small gold holding is typically recommended even by financial planners, like Eaton, who are skeptical of buying gold now [remember, he doesn't get paid when people buy gold]. Gold is one sliver of commodity holdings that make up 2.5 percent to 5 percent of his clients’ portfolios, Eaton says. [Our Founding Fathers would disapprove.]
Consider this:
The Federal Government’s budget for next year and every year thereafter pushes the $4 Trillion mark – they have no intention of cutting back – and they can barely pay the 1/2% interest on the debt they have now.
The Chinese Yuan (pronounced yoo-ahn) is expected to unpeg from the dollar sometime in the next month so the exchange rate can be properly adjusted by the natural market correction. Since early last year they locked the exchange rate on the IMF at 6.82:$1, and since then we have seen the dollar spiral out of control while the Chinese economy has grown steadily; some experts predict a gain against the dollar of up to 6% during this time. While that doesn’t seem like much, consider how many things are imported from China. As the exchange rates tighten, the cost of goods will increase as well.
Many businesses who are barely making payroll now may be forced to close shop if they do not raise their prices, and may have no other choice anyway. Currency investors across the world will likely convert a substantial portion of their dollar holdings into Yuan to earn on the initial adjustment. This makes every other currency less attractive and shifts money directly into foreign markets to fuel their economies.
Not for nothing, I still think gold is a good buy and will be the only saving grace of America’s economy when the Federal Government collapses. I don’t believe in the dollar, because I don’t believe in the government and few people are buying gold these days for the growth. Gold is not a short term investment, it is something you buy and plan on holding for years to come: People are buying gold so they will have REAL money when it all falls down.
For now, heed the wisdom of, “Buy the book before you buy the investment.” Before investing in anything, educate yourself accordingly.
Have you ever taken a moment to step back and reflect on your life, your career, and your finances, only to see an image in your head that looks something like this?
Well, it’s no accident that you are in this condition. In fact, it is the deliberate intention of the federal government to get as many of us into that scenario as possible. The reason they want to do this is so that they can have an unlimited amount of money to spend through debt financing of the budget, using us as the collateral and the income stream to make their payments to their debtors.
Now of course it is more complicated than that, and so I recommend reading some books about the Federal Reserve and the progressive Income Tax to get some background on these topics. I’d recommend anything by Murray Rothbard as a good starting point. The point to take home is that the Federal Reserve can invent as much money as it wants, private banks are supported by this influx of assets and fractional reserve banking, and the US government is financed through debt, not taxes.
It is very simple however to prove my logical conclusion that the U.S. Empire is purposefully creating debt slaves to finance its operations and to further control our daily lives. The process revolves around two main engines: taxation and banking. Most people think we live in a Capitalist system with free markets and free individuals. That just isn’t true, by any definition of the word Capitalism.
First off, let’s look at taxation.
I’m a visual thinker and it’s easier to get the point across through an illustration, so let’s consider the plight of a hard working new American family: let’s say it’s a freshly married couple, both college grads, somewhere in their mid 20′s. If their annual household income is $70,000, this is what their federal taxes would look like:
Now my numbers may be off here but I think they’re accurate. Even if I am wrong, I’m still doing better than the IRS.
Anyway, I’m actually giving the feds a break with this tax sheet. In reality they also collect a federal gas tax, embedded corporate income taxes that affect the price of everything, and a host of other hidden taxes put in place to play favorites within industries. It takes years of law school and private practice to figure all of those out though, so I figured I’d stick to the basics. One item of note in this list that most people don’t realize is that your employer, in addition to withholding from your paycheck, also has to pay the federal government a matching amount of taxes for medicare and social security, so that’s 7.65% of your paycheck that could be yours if the government wasn’t taking it from your employer.
OK, back to our young married couple, just starting out in life. Here’s a chart illustrating what their income looks like after the federal government has taken their cut:
So, it’s about a 60/40 relationship, and this doesn’t include hidden federal taxes or any of the state and local taxes and fees. Our young couple is left with about $40,000 to fund their living expenses, including rent, car payments, student loans, groceries, utilities, etc. Like most young couples, they have high hopes for the future, so they save up what little they have left, let’s say $5000 a year. They plan to use that for things like a down payment on a house or a new car, or expenses related to having children.
Let’s compare that to the world where the federal government didn’t exist, and a state government adhered to the rules of capitalism (no income taxes, for one.) What would their pie look like after that?
What a difference! Obviously we are making two big assumptions here: 1) despite the economic prosperity guaranteed with capitalism, their income has remained the same, and 2) without the government stealing 40% of their money they would have the discipline to keep their expenses to pre-freedom levels. I’d say those two cancel each other out.
Even so, the next phase of creating debt slaves is abundantly clear: banking. You see, under capitalism, you would be able to keep your capital, and our young couple would have about $33,000 a year to spend on things like children, a house, cars, etc. They would have no need for banks. You can get a really nice car for $33,000, especially one made with non-union labor here in the South.
Back here in reality though, they don’t have that money. They are now forced to either do without, or to go into debt. Let’s say this young family takes their meager savings and makes a down payment on a house. They’re going to be in debt for about 30 years so they have to get a house that will hold the children they plan to have. When it’s all said and done, now they have a big monthly payment and even less to set aside as savings. They could have just paid for a house outright in cash if they were left alone to be free after just a few years of savings, but now they are basically indentured servants to the bank so they can have a roof over their heads.
The same thing applies to any other purchase: cars, medical expenses, the cost of having children, etc. Everything they do is tight and they have to stretch their money, and for what? It’s simple: the federal government taxes us so that we won’t have our own capital, so that we have to use debt financing so that the banks will get richer, so that the banks will continue to funnel money into the federal government, so that the federal government can continue to spend and grow its empire. The U.S. gets the privilege of the use of force to make this all happen. You are therefore a slave, because you are paying the debt of the government against your will. Try not paying your taxes, or not paying your mortgage, and see what happens. You may think that slavery is an inappropriate term here, but please tell me: just how much of your life does the government control before you are a slave? Think about it.
What’s worse, and what’s really insidious about the whole thing, is that people could also use their capital as investment. Imagine an economy where you don’t have to shoot to the top or make some miraculous move in order to have capital to use for starting a business, investing in a company, inventing a new product, etc. We hear the stories about the businessmen who conquered all odds and took extraordinary risks and became wildly successful, but what about the opportunity costs of all of those other would-be entrepreneurs that are stuck in a cubicle somewhere? What innovations are we lacking today because those individuals didn’t have the flexibility to try something new?
The U.S. Government doesn’t care. In fact, they don’t want us making such progress, because then we might not need them any more. Well I contend that we don’t need them now, and we must secede to be free.